The image below shows the current zoning conditions of the North Recycling and Disposal Station and the surrounding areas.
The hatched area of the map shows two different zones that NRDS would like to expand their facilities into. To do this, current zoning must be changed or overridden.
The Seattle Department of Planning and Development (DPD) has advised that SPU confine their rebuild to the IC-45 zone. Click on the image to enlarge.
This is a reminder that the North Recycling and Disposal Station Stakeholder Group will be meeting next Tuesday, April 21st from 6-8 pm.Food and refreshments start at 5:30 pm. It's at Hamilton Middle School Library, 2nd Floor, 4400 Interlake Ave N. Reminder: Hamilton Middle School is temporarily located at the old Lincoln High School. Please enter at the Interlake Avenue entrance.
Below is a document that SPU distributed at a recent Wallingford Community Council meeting. It discusses why they are rebuilding the Recycling and Disposal Station, what's planned for the new station and the proposed benefits to our neighborhood.
NESTS met with Councilmember Nick Licata on March 6th to discuss the plans for the North Transfer Station and the need for an Environmental Impact Statement prior to proceeding with the design, demolition, rebuilding and enlargement of the Station.
We expressed our concern about the toxicity on the site, storm water run off, traffic and noise. We also expressed our concern that the size and design of the facility will have a negative impact on the neighborhood. In addition, there appear to be significant zoning issues involved.
We recently received a letter from Mr. Licata that was sent to the Acting Director of Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) expressing his support for an Environmental Impact Statement on the North Transfer Station before proceeding.
NESTS thanks Councilmember Licata for his support and commitment to our neighborhood.
NESTS aims to protect the Wallingford and Fremont communities by insisting that Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prior to proceeding with the design, demolition, rebuilding and expansion of the City's north recycling and waste disposal station. NESTS seeks to work with the City to ensure that, if a new facility is located in our community, it is environmentally safe and appropriate to the neighborhood.
The SEPA process for an EIS is much more rigorous than a checklist, even a checklist with additional environmental "reports" such as SPU prepared. The EIS process must define the issues/impacts that need to be addressed. This is subject to public comment. The agency must then publish a draft EIS which is subject to public review and comment. The agency must respond to the comments submitted and either change the impacts analysis or explain why they believe such changes are not warranted. Essentially, it's a peer review process that is much more complete than a checklist. This process allows for a much more thorough vetting of the agency's claims regarding impacts, including development of technical information that is not readily available outside the agency unless it's forced into the open through the comment and response process. Public interest groups often obtain an expert review of the draft EIS that leads to changes in the EIS and, sometimes, the decision.
Additionally, an EIS requires agencies to look at alternatives. That's one of the key purposes of SEPA, to provide comparative impact analysis so the agency can make an informed decision, and hopefully pick an option that will meet the projects' goals with the least amount of environmental harm. The other main point of SEPA is the requirement to develop mitigation to address impacts identified in the EIS.
